首页> 外文OA文献 >Characterization of fine and carbonaceous particles emissions from pelletized biomass-coal blends combustion: Implications on residential crop residue utilization in China
【2h】

Characterization of fine and carbonaceous particles emissions from pelletized biomass-coal blends combustion: Implications on residential crop residue utilization in China

机译:颗粒状生物质-煤混合物燃烧产生的细小和碳质颗粒排放的特征:对中国居民农作物残渣利用的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bulk biofuel, biomass pellets and pelletized biomass-coal blends were combusted in a typical rural conventional household stove and a high-efficiency stove. Reductions in PM2.5, organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) emissions were evaluated by comparing emission factors (EFs) among 19 combinations of biofuel/residential stove types measured using a dilution sampling system. In the low efficiency stove, the average EFs of PM2.5, OC, and EC of biomass pellets were 2.64 +/- 1.56, 0.42 +/- 0.36, and 0.30 +/- 0.11 g/kg, respectively, significantly lower than those burned in bulk form. EFPM2.5 and EFOC of pelletized biomass combustion in the high-efficiency stove were lower than those of the same biofuel burned in the low-efficiency stove. Furthermore, pelletized corn residue and coal blends burned in the high-efficiency stove could significantly decrease emissions. Compared with the bulk material burned in the low-efficiency stove, the reduction rates of PM2.5, OC and EC from pelletized blends in the high-efficiency stove can reach 84%, 96% and 93%, respectively. If the annually produced corn residues in 2010 had been blended with 10% anthracite coal powder and burnt as pellets, it would have reduced about 82% of PM2.5, 90-96% of OC and 81-92% of EC emission in comparison with burning raw materials in conventional household stoves. Given the low cost, high health benefit and reduction effect on atmospheric pollutants, pelletized blends could be a promising alternative to fossil fuel resources or traditional bulk biofuel. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在典型的农村常规家用炉灶和高效炉灶中燃烧散装生物燃料,生物质颗粒和颗粒状生物质-煤混合物。通过比较使用稀释采样系统测量的19种生物燃料/住宅灶具组合中的排放因子(EFs),评估了PM2.5,有机碳(OC)和元素碳(EC)排放量的减少。在低效率炉灶中,生物质颗粒的PM2.5,OC和EC的平均EF分别为2.64 +/- 1.56、0.42 +/- 0.36和0.30 +/- 0.11 g / kg,明显低于那些散装燃烧。高效炉灶中颗粒生物质燃烧的EFPM2.5和EFOC低于低效炉灶中相同生物燃料的EFPM2.5和EFOC。此外,在高效炉灶中燃烧的粒状玉米残渣和煤混合物可以显着减少排放。与低效率炉灶中燃烧的散装物料相比,高效炉灶中颗粒状混合物的PM2.5,OC和EC降低率分别达到84%,96%和93%。如果将2010年的年产玉米残渣与10%的无烟煤粉混合并制成颗粒状燃烧,与之相比,它将减少约82%的PM2.5、90-96%的OC和EC-81-92%的排放。用传统的家用炉灶燃烧原料。鉴于其低成本,高健康效益和对大气污染物的减少效果,造粒混合物可以成为化石燃料资源或传统散装生物燃料的有希望替代品。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号